Slippery Slope

Every day I read hours worth of news mostly for pleasure, but also to keep abreast of events that might impact my job directly. Today, as I prepared to board a connecting flight to Miami, I read an opinion/interview piece that genuinely scared me. The person being interviewed was the so-called “Dr. Doom” of Wall-Street. In it, he reasserted his belief that many of the nation’s major financial institutions should be outright nationalized.

Throughout the course of the global financial crisis, I have loosened most of my tightly held beliefs concerning market/capitalist economies and all ideas therein. Like many others, I was on board the Free Market train though out the majority of the decade. Letting go of this has been sobering to say the least, but it is becoming increasingly evident to me that we as a nation are dealing poorly with our enormous hangover.

In econ/philosophy we study a simple term called the “slippery slope.” In this term we come to understand that any deviation from a defined dogma or practice creates a greater propensity to continue to move farther away from the original position. This concept is troubling in terms of market economies with everything from universal health care, and more obviously now, governments taking ownership interests in private entities.

While I have acquiesced to the concepts of “systemic risk” and “too-big-to-fail,” I have struggled with each step. The article mentioned above highlights what happens when we go down the slippery slope. “Dr. Doom” asserts that a major reason for nationalization is because we have effectively done it already. This is of course partially true, but his assertion and reasoning are deeply disturbing. It is now, more than ever, that governments and the populace should most fervently resist outright socialism. If we set the precedent of nationalization, we lose credibility on every front. Investors will be even more reluctant to purchase equities and provide private capital. Just look at Venezuela’s most recent economic troubles resulting directly from socialism and lack of foreign investment. If continued and outright nationalization were to occur, the government would turn into a true Leviathon, and set the table for all manners of other socialist policies. If the media, major economists, and the Obama administration want to not only preserve the heart of our capitalist integrity, but also the “moat” around America that makes it so attractive for investment relative to other countries, they will ardently work towards market solutions- not government ones.